Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Dataset . 2019
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Dataset . 2019
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Supporting students in making informed data sharing decisions: from comprehension to consenting

Authors: Beardsley, Marc; Martinez-Moreno, Judit; Santos, Patricia; Hernández-Leo, Davinia;

Supporting students in making informed data sharing decisions: from comprehension to consenting

Abstract

Whether deciding to participate in research or gain access to online applications, studies on consent suggest that individuals often do not read or fail to understand the text outlining the conditions they agree to when giving their consent. Limited comprehension related to the risks of big data and habituation may contribute to consent being given in a manner that counters the best interests of individuals (i.e. a privacy paradox). Are those asking students to use new technologies and share their data ethically responsible for helping students learn to make informed decisions regarding the sharing of their data? As educational technology researchers, we conducted a quasi-experimental study involving 127 undergraduate students in which we explored the effects on study enrollment of supporting students in making informed data sharing decisions. Prior to reading the consent form for a study involving the evaluation of a collaborative learning application, one group of participants was primed to consider data sharing risks whereas the other group was not. The primed group scored lower on a consent form comprehension quiz yet had higher enrollment rates and were more likely to cite trust as reasoning for enrolling in the study. The data set is composed by: ‘Classes’ spreadsheet: including the relation of flows, group of students, number of students, instructor id, day and time ‘Participants’ spreadsheet: including the relation of ID (of each participant), if s/he consented, group class, flow and language ‘Prior knowledge Survey’ spreadsheet: participant’s ID and ID, relevant prior knowledge questionnaire data (questions included). ‘Quiz data’ spreadsheet: participant’s ID, quiz data and survey data (questions included) PDF including: Table S1. Summary of participating classes Table S2. Consent form subsections and summaries Table S3. Consent form quiz questions, question types, and assigned points Table S4. Guiding questions in the prior knowledge questionnaire Table S5. Comparison of Flow A and Flow B quiz scores per question

Keywords

Ethics, Responsible Research, Informed Consent, Educational Technology, Data Sharing Risks

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 10
  • 10
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
10