
pmid: 25437694
The difficulties with airway management is the main reason for pediatric anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality.To assess the value of modified Mallampati test, Upper-Lip-Bite test, thyromental distance and the ratio of height to thyromental distance to predict difficult intubation in pediatric patients.Prospective analysis.Data were collected from 5 to 11 years old 250 pediatric patients requiring tracheal intubation. The Cormack and Lehane classification was used to evaluate difficult laryngoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and AUC values for each test were measured.The sensitivity and specificity of modified Mallampati test were 76.92% and 95.54%, while those for ULBT were 69.23% and 97.32%. The optimal cutoff point for the ratio of height to thyromental distance and thyromental distance for predicting difficult laryngoscopy was 23.5 (sensitivity, 57.69%; specificity, 86.61%) and 5.5cm (sensitivity, 61.54%; specificity, 99.11%). The modified Mallampati was the most sensitive of the tests. The ratio of height to thyromental distance was the least sensitive test.These results suggested that the modified Mallampati and Upper-Lip-Bite tests may be useful in pediatric patients for predicting difficult intubation.
Intubación difícil, Pediatria, Laryngoscopy, Difficult intubation, Mallampati Classification, Pediatría, Test predictivos, Predictive Tests, Claims, Testes preditivos, Pediatrics, Predictive tests, Lip Bite Test, Tracheal Intubation, Anesthesiology, Difficult Intubation, Anesthesia, RD78.3-87.3, Intubação difícil, Children
Intubación difícil, Pediatria, Laryngoscopy, Difficult intubation, Mallampati Classification, Pediatría, Test predictivos, Predictive Tests, Claims, Testes preditivos, Pediatrics, Predictive tests, Lip Bite Test, Tracheal Intubation, Anesthesiology, Difficult Intubation, Anesthesia, RD78.3-87.3, Intubação difícil, Children
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
