
pmid: 33738655
pmc: PMC7972020
AbstractThis paper sets out a structured process for the co-production of knowledge between researchers and societal partners and illustrates its application in an urban health equity project in Accra, Ghana. The main insight of this approach is that research and knowledge co-production is always partial, both in the sense of being incomplete, as well as being circumscribed by the interests of participating researchers and societal partners. A second insight is that project-bound societal engagement takes place in a broader context of public and policy debate. The approach to co-production described here is formed of three recursive processes: co-designing, co-analysing, and co-creating knowledge. These ‘co-production loops’ are themselves iterative, each representing a stage of knowledge production. Each loop is operationalized through a series of research and engagement practices, which we call building blocks. Building blocks are activities and interaction-based methods aimed at bringing together a range of participants involved in joint knowledge production. In practice, recursive iterations within loops may be limited due of constraints on time, resources, or attention. We suggest that co-production loops and building blocks are deployed flexibly.
Economics, Knowledge management, FOS: Political science, Health Professions, FOS: Law, Epistemology, Ghana, Article, Context (archaeology), Sociology, Knowledge Translation, Knowledge production, Health Sciences, Microeconomics, Humans, Equity (law), Business, Production (economics), Empowerment and Collaboration in Community Health, Operationalization, Political science, Advancing Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Healthcare, Health Equity, Geography, Urban Health, Computer science, 301, Process (computing), FOS: Sociology, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, Philosophy, Operating system, Knowledge, Policy, Archaeology, General Health Professions, Law, Patient and Public Engagement in Healthcare Research
Economics, Knowledge management, FOS: Political science, Health Professions, FOS: Law, Epistemology, Ghana, Article, Context (archaeology), Sociology, Knowledge Translation, Knowledge production, Health Sciences, Microeconomics, Humans, Equity (law), Business, Production (economics), Empowerment and Collaboration in Community Health, Operationalization, Political science, Advancing Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Healthcare, Health Equity, Geography, Urban Health, Computer science, 301, Process (computing), FOS: Sociology, FOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion, Philosophy, Operating system, Knowledge, Policy, Archaeology, General Health Professions, Law, Patient and Public Engagement in Healthcare Research
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
