Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Neutralizing antibodies in dystonic patients who still respond well to botulinum toxin type A

Authors: Gottfried Kranz; P. Schnider; Georg S. Kranz; Eduard Auff; Thomas Sycha; Bernhard Voller;

Neutralizing antibodies in dystonic patients who still respond well to botulinum toxin type A

Abstract

Complete secondary therapy failure due to antibodies against botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A-ABs) may raise extensive treatment difficulties. We tested whether neutralizing BoNT/A-ABs can be detected in dystonic patients with good clinical responses to botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) treatment.We used the ninhydrin sweat test (NST) and the mouse diaphragm test (MDT) in 28 subjects. Of 119 dystonic patients who responded well to BoNT/A, we randomly selected 14 and compared the results of the NST and MDT with 14 healthy controls.Higher BoNT/A-AB titers correlated significantly with smaller anhidrotic areas. We found seven patients with borderline antibody (AB) values (MDT 0.4 to 0.8 mU/mL) with significantly smaller anhidrotic areas (NST) compared with healthy controls and AB-negative patients. Risk factors for smaller anhidrotic areas were short injection intervals but not prolonged exposure to BoNT/A or high injection doses.These data demonstrate that >40% of dystonic patients who respond well to botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) show partial nonresponsiveness on the ninhydrin sweat test and have low titers of neutralizing BoNT/A antibodies.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Ninhydrin, Middle Aged, Antibodies, Statistics, Nonparametric, Dystonia, Neuromuscular Agents, Humans, Female, Botulinum Toxins, Type A, Sweat, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    36
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
36
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?