
pmid: 14616909
AbstractBackground Increasingly, deaf students are educated in mainstream school environments. This poses a question of how deaf children negotiate the demands of forming friendships with their hearing peers. The present study was designed to examine coping strategies of 35 deaf children attending full or partial mainstream school settings.Method Using a qualitative analysis design, a range of coping strategies used by the children was described based on parents’ reports. The relative success of these coping strategies in establishing relationships with hearing peers was assessed by examining strategies that increased the social success of deaf girls and boys.Results The results showed differences by gender in the effectiveness of coping strategies used by the participants. Deaf girls who were confident and frequently asked for clarifications or who were comfortable playing alone tended to achieve good relationships with hearing peers. In contrast, deaf boys’ relationships with hearing peers benefited mostly from the boys’ ability to perform well in sports.Conclusions These findings are discussed in light of existing research on coping and current debates on the benefits of mainstreaming for deaf children.
Male, Deafness, Psychology, Social, Play and Playthings, Mainstreaming, Education, Sex Factors, Assertiveness, Child, Preschool, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Female, Interpersonal Relations, Child, Personality, Sports
Male, Deafness, Psychology, Social, Play and Playthings, Mainstreaming, Education, Sex Factors, Assertiveness, Child, Preschool, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Female, Interpersonal Relations, Child, Personality, Sports
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
