
arXiv: 2109.08202
handle: 11353/10.1662058
This work analyses the performance of quantum circuits and general processes to transformkuses of an arbitrary unitary operationUinto another unitary operationf(U). When the desired functionfa homomorphism, i.e.,f(UV)=f(U)f(V), it is known that optimal average fidelity is attainable by parallel circuits and indefinite causality does not provide any advantage. Here we show that the situation changes dramatically when considering anti-homomorphisms, i.e.,f(UV)=f(V)f(U). In particular, we prove that whenfis an anti-homomorphism, sequential circuits could exponentially outperform parallel ones and processes with indefinite causal order could outperform sequential ones. We presented explicit constructions on how to obtain such advantages for the unitary inversion taskf(U)=U−1and the unitary transposition taskf(U)=UT. We also stablish a one-to-one connection between the problem of unitary estimation and parallel unitary transposition, allowing one to easily translate results from one field to the other. Finally, we apply our results to several concrete problem instances and present a method based on computer-assisted proofs to show optimality.
Quantum Physics, Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous), GENERAL-THEORY, 103025 Quantenmechanik, Physics, QC1-999, FOS: Physical sciences, 102019 Machine learning, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, STATE, CLONING, 102019 Machine Learning, 103025 Quantum mechanics, Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
Quantum Physics, Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous), GENERAL-THEORY, 103025 Quantenmechanik, Physics, QC1-999, FOS: Physical sciences, 102019 Machine learning, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, STATE, CLONING, 102019 Machine Learning, 103025 Quantum mechanics, Quantum Physics (quant-ph)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
