<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 7942656
Upper molar eruption and its clinical significance to vertical control were measured in a retrospective cephalometric study of 40 patients (20 with and 20 without transpalatal arches) treated in a private practice. Pretreatment and posttreatment cephalometric values were compared to determine how well the patients were matched. No statistically significant differences were noted between control and test groups for the following variables: maxillary and mandibular molar vertical eruption per year, maxillary complex vertical growth per year, effective horizontal condylar growth per year, ratio of effective horizontal pogonion movement to effective vertical pogonion movement, ratio of effective vertical condylar growth to the summation of maxillary, and mandibular vertical molar eruption plus maxillary complex vertical growth, beginning age, and ending age. The control group exhibited statistically greater forward positioning of pogonion and greater effective vertical condylar growth than did the treatment group.
Chin, Adolescent, Rotation, Tooth Movement Techniques, Cephalometry, Age Factors, Vertical Dimension, Mandible, Molar, Facial Bones, Tooth Eruption, Orthodontic Appliances, Maxilla, Humans, Orthodontic Appliance Design, Regression Analysis, Child, Retrospective Studies
Chin, Adolescent, Rotation, Tooth Movement Techniques, Cephalometry, Age Factors, Vertical Dimension, Mandible, Molar, Facial Bones, Tooth Eruption, Orthodontic Appliances, Maxilla, Humans, Orthodontic Appliance Design, Regression Analysis, Child, Retrospective Studies
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |