Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Thallium-201 scan in evaluating thyroid nodules following equivocal fine-needle aspiration cytology

Authors: J K, Lee; R S, Liu; S Y, Wu; W S, Huang; M C, Chou;

Thallium-201 scan in evaluating thyroid nodules following equivocal fine-needle aspiration cytology

Abstract

Summary:The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the usefulness of the thallium-201 (201Tl) thyroid scan in the detection of malignancy in cold thyroid nodules whose status was equivocal following palpation fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Patients, methods: Fifty-one patients with clinically palpable solitary cold thyroid nodules classified as non-diagnostic or suspicious following biopsy underwent 201Tl thyroid scans. Each scan was performed 15 min (early scan) and 3 h (delayed scan) after an intravenous administration of 74 MBq 201Tl. Thallium uptake in the nodules was visually assessed and scored on a three point scale, with a grade of three defining malignancy. All patients underwent surgery and the histopathology of nodule tissues were compared with results of the scans. Results: Fifty-one nodules were examined. Forty were benign and 11 were malignant. For early scans, the diagnostically relevant parameters were: sensitivity (100%), specificity (75%), and accuracy (80%). Corresponding findings for the delayed scan were: 91%, 98%, and 96%. Conclusion: The 201Tl scan is useful for detecting malignancy in cold thyroid nodules classified as nondiagnostic or suspicious lesions by FNAC.

Keywords

Male, Thallium Radioisotopes, Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Female, Thyroid Nodule, Radionuclide Imaging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!