
‘Assessment’ and ‘feedback’ are inherently embedded in a course curriculum of engineering education settings. These components are indispensable for the teaching-learning processes. It is observed that engineering faculty members do not require any ‘teacher-training’ to join the engineering institutions across the globe. Hence, they may not have adequate experience in assessing students’ performances and providing feedback to students. Only a few research studies have been carried out on assessment and feedback from the engineering education context. Therefore, this paper attempts to critically analyse the literature pertaining to learning through different types and methods of assessment practices in the engineering education settings. Further, it examines the significance of qualitative feedback in assessment and the principles of good feedback practice. It highlights the implications of assessing student performance and providing feedback from the engineering education perspective. Finally, the paper offers some recommendations on assessment and feedback practices in the engineering education settings.
SocArXiv|Education, bepress|Education, bepress|Education|Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research, bepress|Education|Teacher Education and Professional Development, SocArXiv|Education|Higher Education, SocArXiv|Education|Teacher Education and Professional Development, bepress|Education|Higher Education, SocArXiv|Education|Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
SocArXiv|Education, bepress|Education, bepress|Education|Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research, bepress|Education|Teacher Education and Professional Development, SocArXiv|Education|Higher Education, SocArXiv|Education|Teacher Education and Professional Development, bepress|Education|Higher Education, SocArXiv|Education|Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
