
pmid: 34886961
handle: 20.500.11768/193372 , 11379/559512 , 11568/1125215
Although mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) achieves symptomatic benefit for a broad spectrum of patients with relevant secondary mitral regurgitation, conflicting data exist on its prognostic impact.Adapted enrollment criteria approaching those used in the COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation) and MITRA-FR (Percutaneous Repair or Medical Treatment for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation) trials were retrospectively applied to a European real-world registry to evaluate the influence of the respective criteria on outcomes.A total of 1,022 patients included in the EuroSMR (European Registry of Transcatheter Repair for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation) registry and treated with M-TEER (November 2008 to September 2019) were stratified into COAPT-eligible (n = 353 [34.5%]) and COAPT-ineligible (n = 669 [65.5%]) as well as MITRA-FR-eligible (n = 408 [48.3%]) and MITRA-FR-ineligible (n = 437 [51.7%]) groups.Although the stratification of patients according to adapted MITRA-FR criteria led to comparable outcomes regarding all-cause mortality (P = 0.19), the application of adapted COAPT enrollment criteria demonstrated lower mortality rates in COAPT-eligible compared with COAPT-ineligible patients (P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified New York Heart Association functional class IV (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.53-3.42; P < 0.001), logarithmic N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (HR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.24-1.75; P < 0.001), and right ventricular-to-pulmonary arterial coupling (HR: 0.10; 95% CI: 0.02-0.57; P = 0.009) as independent predictors of outcome. Yet improvement of functional outcome was demonstrated in a subset of patients irrespective of COAPT eligibility status.In this real-world cohort of patients with secondary mitral regurgitation undergoing M-TEER, the retrospective application of adapted COAPT enrollment criteria successfully identified a specific phenotype demonstrating lower mortality rates. On the contrary, stratification according to adapted MITRA-FR criteria resulted in comparable outcomes.
Male, Cardiac Catheterization, Outcome Assessment, edge-to-edge repair; secondary mitral regurgitation; transcatheter mitral valve repair; Aged; Cardiac Catheterization; Europe; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Humans; Male; Mitral Valve; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate; Adaptation, Physiological; Registries, Physiological, transcatheter mitral valve repair, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, edge-to-edge repair, Humans, Registries, Adaptation, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Prognosis, Adaptation, Physiological, Health Care, Europe, Survival Rate, Mitral Valve, Female, secondary mitral regurgitation, Follow-Up Studies
Male, Cardiac Catheterization, Outcome Assessment, edge-to-edge repair; secondary mitral regurgitation; transcatheter mitral valve repair; Aged; Cardiac Catheterization; Europe; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Humans; Male; Mitral Valve; Mitral Valve Insufficiency; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Survival Rate; Adaptation, Physiological; Registries, Physiological, transcatheter mitral valve repair, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, edge-to-edge repair, Humans, Registries, Adaptation, Aged, Retrospective Studies, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Prognosis, Adaptation, Physiological, Health Care, Europe, Survival Rate, Mitral Valve, Female, secondary mitral regurgitation, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 53 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
