Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Sentence Reception Abilities of Hearing Impaired Students Across Five Communication Modes

Authors: K A, Pudlas;

Sentence Reception Abilities of Hearing Impaired Students Across Five Communication Modes

Abstract

The author measured hearing impaired students' reception of language presented via five modes: oral, aural, manual, oral-aural and simultaneous manual and oral. The study utilized a within-subjects design stimulus sentences controlled for length, phrase structure, syntax, vocabulary level and visemic content. Participants were 53 females and 53 males between 90 and 225 months of age ([inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="01i"/] = 175) with HTLs between 67 and 113 dB (ANSI) ([inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="02i"/] = 97.7). Each received 12 sentences via each mode. With a maximum score of 57, the simultaneous manual and oral ([inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="03i"/] = 33.2) and manual ([inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="04i"/] = 31.5) modes received the highest ratings. Results are discussed in the context of several theories of cognitive processing and selective attention.

Keywords

Male, Adolescent, Communication, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Lipreading, Sign Language, Cognition, Humans, Female, Child

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!