Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Academic Medicinearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Academic Medicine
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
Academic Medicine
Article . 1995 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A standardized-patient assessment of a continuing medical education program to improve physiciansʼ cancer-control clinical skills

Authors: P A, Carney; A J, Dietrich; D H, Freeman; L A, Mott;

A standardized-patient assessment of a continuing medical education program to improve physiciansʼ cancer-control clinical skills

Abstract

Although continuing medical education (CME) has long been used to inform physicians and teach specific skills, its efficacy in many areas is not well established. This randomized controlled trial assessed the effects of differing educational techniques on the cancer-control skills of 57 physicians.The CME program was part of the Cancer Prevention in Community Practice Project in Hanover, New Hampshire, and was implemented in 1988. The program used several methods in its presentation, including interactive small-group discussion, role playing, videotaped clinical encounters, lecture presentations, and trigger tapes. Measurements included cross-sectional observations made by unannounced standardized patients (SPs) who, one year after the CME program, assessed 25 physicians who had participated in the program and 32 physicians who had not. To measure consistency in the SPs' performances and accuracy in assessing the physicians' performances, most interactions were audiotaped using a hidden microphone. Pearson chi-square, Fisher exact two-tailed test, and kappa coefficients were used for analysis.Significantly higher ratings were found for the CME physicians in two areas: breast cancer risk-factor determination (determined maternal history: 80% versus 52%, p = .03; determined age at first period: 16% versus 0%, p = .02), and smoking cessation counseling (providing written material: 32% versus 9%, p = .03). The CME physicians were rated higher on all 19 study variables in the target areas of early detection of breast cancer and smoking cessation. The results show that the physicians' performance were better in those areas where the CME program had used performance-based learning, such as role playing or viewing and discussing a videotaped role-play encounter.The educational techniques that rehearsed or portrayed clinical applications seem to have increased the physicians' performances of cancer-control clinical activities. The standardized-patient instrument seems to be particularly useful in evaluating interventions that address specific skills training.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Breast Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Smoking Prevention, Middle Aged, Medical Oncology, Patient Simulation, Task Performance and Analysis, Humans, New Hampshire, Education, Medical, Continuing, Female, Smoking Cessation, Clinical Competence, Program Development

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    79
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
79
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
bronze