Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao British Journal of U...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
British Journal of Urology
Article . 1999 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Assessing the risk of unsuspected prostate cancer in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy: a 13‐year retrospective study of the incidence and natural history of T1a‐T1b prostate cancers

Authors: B, Tombal; L, De Visccher; J P, Cosyns; F, Lorge; R, Opsomer; F X, Wese; P J, Van Cangh;

Assessing the risk of unsuspected prostate cancer in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy: a 13‐year retrospective study of the incidence and natural history of T1a‐T1b prostate cancers

Abstract

Objective To determine the incidence and natural history of stage T1a‐T1b prostate cancer in patients undergoing surgery for benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH), and thus evaluate the effect that recent medical and ‘minimally invasive’ treatments (which provide no prostate sample for pathological examination) might have on the percentage of patients with unsuspected prostate cancer. Patients and methods A series of 1648 patients undergoing surgery for BPH over a 13‐year period were reviewed retrospectively; the period overlapped the introduction of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) as a detection method. Results Stage T1 prostate cancer was found in 182 patients (11%), comprising 126 (11%) of 1199 transurethral resections and 56 (12%) of 449 open enucleations. The introduction of systematic PSA assays gradually reduced the mean incidence of T1 cancer from 23% to 7%, with a greater effect on T1b (from 15% to 2%), while the incidence of T1a remained nearly constant (±5%). The pathological features of surgical specimens from 43 radical prostatectomies undertaken for T1 tumours were reviewed. Locally advanced disease (stage ≥pT3) was apparent in 13% of T1a and 28% of T1b tumours. Amongst the patients electing for surveillance, only 8% of those with T1a progressed within 30–97 months of follow‐up (mean progression time 73 months), whereas 29% of those with stage T1b progressed within 36 months of follow‐up (mean progression time 17 months). Conclusion These results show that the use of the PSA assay has decreased but not suppressed the incidence of pT1 prostate cancer, with a greater effect on those tumours at higher risk of progression (T1b). This suggests that the detection of prostate cancer based on PSA and transrectal ultrasonography is appropriate for screening patients and is sufficiently accurate that treatments for BPH that provide no pathological materials can be applied safely.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Aged, 80 and over, Male, Prostatectomy, Incidence, Prostatic Hyperplasia, Prostatic Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Risk Assessment, Disease-Free Survival, Preoperative Care, Humans, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    66
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
66
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!