Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of AOAC Inte...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of AOAC International
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: OUP Standard Publication Reuse
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Interlaboratory Validation of the Mehlich 3 Method as a Universal Extractant for Plant Nutrients

Authors: Jackie L, Schroder; Hailin, Zhang; Jaben R, Richards; Mark E, Payton;

Interlaboratory Validation of the Mehlich 3 Method as a Universal Extractant for Plant Nutrients

Abstract

Abstract The Mehlich 3 (M3) method is widely used to extract plant-available phosphorus from soil over a wide range of pH values. The method is also used by many laboratories to determine multiple plant-available nutrients simultaneously. However, except for P, this method has not been statistically validated within and among laboratories. The objective of this study was to determine the repeatability (within-laboratory performance) and reproducibility (among-laboratories performance) of the M3 method for several different nutrients by using a wide variety of soils. An in-house homogeneity test was conducted for 11 soils. Three replicates of each of the 11 soils were sent to 23 domestic and international laboratories for analyses primarily for K, Ca, Mg, Zn, Mn, Fe, and Cu. Samples were scooped, weighed, or both scooped and weighed for extraction. The various nutrients in the extracts were quantified by the participating laboratories by using inductively coupled plasmaatomic emission spectrometry. Ranges (in parentheses) of the repeatability relative standard deviation (RSDr) values for the scooped samples were K (3.886.14), Ca (2.1910.6), Mg (2.275.73), Zn (4.1142.7), Mn (3.158.53), Fe (2.327.74), and Cu (3.6511.2). For the weighed samples, the ranges (in parentheses) of the RSDr values were K (1.654.65), Ca (1.4316.9), Mg (1.379.83), Zn (2.6033.0), Mn (1.614.90), Fe (1.564.47), and Cu (2.9517.9). Ranges (in parentheses) of the reproducibility relative standard deviation (RSDR) values for the scooped samples were K (7.4420.0), Ca (7.1033.5), Mg (7.6326.4), Zn (11.648.7), Mn (10.519.7), Fe (12.422.0), and Cu (8.8645.3). Ranges (in parentheses) of the RSDR values for the weighed samples were K (3.4712.7), Ca (7.6134.6), Mg (7.5329.0), Zn (10.649.2), Mn (6.5420.7), Fe (11.021.5), and Cu (9.7343.0). The Horwitz ratios (HorRat) were also used to evaluate the repeatability, HorRatr, and the reproducibility, HorRatR. Overall, the M3 method appears to be both repeatable and reproducible across the two categories for K, Mg, Zn, Mn, and Cu, and the vast majority of the HorRat values for both repeatability and reproducibility were within the acceptable range. However, a large number of soils in both the weighed and scooped categories displayed unacceptable HorRat values for the reproducibility of Ca and Fe, indicating that the M3 is not suitable for the extraction and quantitation of Ca and Fe in soils. The results of this study indicate that the M3 method for the determination of K, Mg, Zn, Mn, and Cu in soils is both accurate and precise when standardized procedures are used. The method has been proven to be suitable for use as a reference method for testing soil materials for extractable P, K, Mg, Zn, Mn, and Cu. Further study may be needed to confirm the suitability of the M3 method for Ca and Fe.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Quality Control, Spectrophotometry, Atomic, Reproducibility of Results, Phosphorus, Solutions, Soil, Food, Metals, Algorithms, Plant Physiological Phenomena

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    19
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
19
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
hybrid