
This study was designed to test the hypothesis that alternative vegetation management treatments (manual cutting and cut-stump applications of glyphosate herbicide) would decrease plant community abundance, species diversity, and structural diversity of young mixed conifer plantations in southern British Columbia, Canada. The experimental design consisted of nine operational-sized plantations, stratified into three blocks (1 control, 1 manual, and 1 cut-stump plantation per block), with five permanent strip-transects to sample vegetation within each plantation. Vegetation management treatments did not significantly (p>0.10) affect the crown volume index of herb, shrub, or coniferous tree layers. However, both manual and cut-stump treatments significantly reduced crown volume index of deciduous trees in the first post-treatment year (p=0.05 and p 0.10) different between treatments and control. Similarly, the structural diversity of herb, shrub, and tree layers were also not significantly (p>0.10) different between treatments and control. By opening the canopy and decreasing the dominance of the deciduous tree layer, both manual and cut-stump treatments showed greater total structural diversity (herb, shrub, and tree layers combined) relative to the control. However, differences in total structural diversity between treatments and control were, for the most part, not significant (p>0.10). Therefore, these vegetation management treatments affected only the volume of the targeted deciduous tree layer and did not adversely affect the species richness, diversity, turnover, or structural diversity of the plant community. These results may be applicable to other temperate forest ecosystems where conifer release is practised in young plantations.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 49 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
