
The aim of this study is to assess a software-based method with semiautomated correction for partial volume effect (PVE) to quantify the metabolic activity of pulmonary malignancies in patients who underwent non-gated and respiratory-gated 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/x-ray computed tomography(CT).The study included 106 lesions of 55 lung cancer patients who underwent respiratory-gated FDG-PET/CT for radiation therapy treatment planning. Volumetric PET/CT parameters were determined by using 4D PET/CT and non-gated PET/CT images. We used a semiautomated program employing an adaptive contrast-oriented thresholding algorithm for lesion delineation as well as a lesion-based partial volume effect correction algorithm. We compared respiratory-gated parameters with non-gated parameters by using pairwise comparison and interclass correlation coefficient assessment. In a multivariable regression analysis, we also examined factors, which can affect quantification accuracy, including the size of lesion and the location of tumor.This study showed that quantification of volumetric parameters of 4D PET/CT images using an adaptive contrast-oriented thresholding algorithm and 3D lesion-based partial volume correction is feasible. We observed slight increase in FDG uptake by using PET/CT volumetric parameters in comparison of highest respiratory-gated values with non-gated values. After correction for partial volume effect, the mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) increased substantially (p value <0.001). However, we did not observe a clinically significant difference between partial volume corrected parameters of respiratory-gated and non-gated PET/CT scans. Regression analysis showed that tumor volume was the main predictor of quantification inaccuracy caused by partial volume effect.Based on this study, assessment of volumetric PET/CT parameters and partial volume effect correction for accurate quantification of lung malignant lesions by using respiratory non-gated PET images are feasible and it is comparable to gated measurements. Partial volume correction increased both the respiratory-gated and non-gated values significantly and appears to be the dominant source of quantification error of lung lesions.
Male, STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUE, Lung Neoplasms, IMPACT, Contrast Media, SOFTWARE, Multimodal Imaging, Respiratory gating, Automation, Motion, POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY, IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, RADIATION-THERAPY, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Metabolic activity quantification, Humans, Radiopharmaceuticals/diagnostic use, Whole Body Imaging, Lung, Lung Neoplasms/radionuclide imaging/radiotherapy, CONCORDANCE CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT, Aged, BREATH-HOLD PET/CT, 616.0757, Respiration, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, CANCER, FDG-PET/CT, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18/diagnostic use, RESPIRATORY MOTION, Positron-Emission Tomography, Partial volume effect, Multivariate Analysis, Regression Analysis, Female, Lung/pathology/radionuclide imaging, Lung cancer, Radiopharmaceuticals, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Algorithms, ddc: ddc:616.0757
Male, STANDARDIZED UPTAKE VALUE, Lung Neoplasms, IMPACT, Contrast Media, SOFTWARE, Multimodal Imaging, Respiratory gating, Automation, Motion, POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY, IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, RADIATION-THERAPY, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Metabolic activity quantification, Humans, Radiopharmaceuticals/diagnostic use, Whole Body Imaging, Lung, Lung Neoplasms/radionuclide imaging/radiotherapy, CONCORDANCE CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT, Aged, BREATH-HOLD PET/CT, 616.0757, Respiration, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, CANCER, FDG-PET/CT, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18/diagnostic use, RESPIRATORY MOTION, Positron-Emission Tomography, Partial volume effect, Multivariate Analysis, Regression Analysis, Female, Lung/pathology/radionuclide imaging, Lung cancer, Radiopharmaceuticals, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Algorithms, ddc: ddc:616.0757
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
