
doi: 10.1002/gj.1164
handle: 1885/75081
AbstractMajor element geochemical analyses of volcanic glass shards from visible, macroscopic tephra layers in Papua New Guinea were used to test field‐based correlations between local Late Holocene sequences. Previously, synchronization of sediment records at archaeological and palaeoecological sites across the Papua New Guinea highlands had been based largely on the physical properties and stratigraphic relationships of visible volcanic layers. The geochemical analysis of tephra‐derived glass demonstrates miscorrelations and enables more robust tephrostratigraphic links to be made between a globally significant archaeological site, Kuk Swamp, and a nearby volcanic cone, Ambra Crater. The results indicate that field‐based correlations of tephras can be problematic, especially given variable post‐depositional changes in colour and texture of relatively thin tephra layers in different depositional environments. Additionally, the findings call into question some previous tephrochronological associations at archaeological and palaeoecological sites in the Papua New Guinea highlands, and demonstrate the necessity of grain‐discrete geochemical analysis of glass shards as a basis for future tephrochronological studies in this region. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Tephras, Pacific Ocean, Holocene, volcanic glass, Pacific islands, 930, tephra, Kuk Swamp, Papua New Guinea, Volcanic glass shards, Keywords: crater, Melanesia, tephrochronology, Papua New Guinea Ambra Crater, geochemistry, Geochemical analysis
Tephras, Pacific Ocean, Holocene, volcanic glass, Pacific islands, 930, tephra, Kuk Swamp, Papua New Guinea, Volcanic glass shards, Keywords: crater, Melanesia, tephrochronology, Papua New Guinea Ambra Crater, geochemistry, Geochemical analysis
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
