
Defined errors are entered into data collections in order to test their influence on the reliability of multivariate rankings. Random numbers and real ranking data serve as data origins. In the course of data collection small random errors often lead to a switch in ranking, which can influence the general ranking picture considerably. For stabilisation an objective weighting method is evaluated. The robustness of these rankings is then compared to the original forms. Robust forms of the published Shanghai top 100 rankings are calculated and compared to each other. As a result, the possibilities and restrictions of this type of weighting become recognisable.
objective weighting; fault tolerance; Shanghai ranking, Article, scientometry, Fehler, ranking, Scientometrics, Bibliometrics, Informetrics, Datengewinnung, Scientometrie, Social sciences, sociology, anthropology, News media, journalism, publishing, Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften, Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie, Szientometrie, Bibliometrie, Informetrie, Gewichtung, error, data capture, Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods, Publizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesen, Ranking, weighting, ddc: ddc:070, ddc: ddc:300
objective weighting; fault tolerance; Shanghai ranking, Article, scientometry, Fehler, ranking, Scientometrics, Bibliometrics, Informetrics, Datengewinnung, Scientometrie, Social sciences, sociology, anthropology, News media, journalism, publishing, Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften, Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie, Szientometrie, Bibliometrie, Informetrie, Gewichtung, error, data capture, Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods, Publizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesen, Ranking, weighting, ddc: ddc:070, ddc: ddc:300
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
