
pmid: 27059764
Purpose Infections are a major setback of vascular reconstruction and associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. We evaluated retrospectively our results with self-made bovine pericardial grafts in infected vessel revascularization versus standard graft material. Basic methods Retrospective analysis of 9 patients with bovine reconstruction and 10 patients with miscellaneous grafts (vein, homograft) for vascular infections. Principal findings Infection-free rate of the pericardial group was 100% in 17 months. For patients after reconstructions with miscellaneous grafts, the infection-free rate was 82% in 45 months. Overall in-hospital mortality was 10.5%. There were no in-hospital deaths in the pericardial group. Graft patency of the whole cohort was 100%. The median follow up was 11.74 months. Conclusion Self-made bovine pericardial tube grafts can be crafted to almost any size and adjusted to complex anatomic requirements. The use was feasible in various situations and was associated with good preliminary results concerning patency and reinfection.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Reoperation, Prosthesis-Related Infections, Middle Aged, Allografts, Prosthesis Design, Disease-Free Survival, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Recurrence, Animals, Heterografts, Humans, Cattle, Female, Hospital Mortality, Pericardium, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Reoperation, Prosthesis-Related Infections, Middle Aged, Allografts, Prosthesis Design, Disease-Free Survival, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation, Recurrence, Animals, Heterografts, Humans, Cattle, Female, Hospital Mortality, Pericardium, Aged
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
