
pmid: 20674036
Recently, the two item version of the Cambridge Depersonalization Scale (CDS-2) has been validated in a clinical sample and has demonstrated that it is a useful tool for the detection of clinically significant depersonalization (DP). In order to provide a framework for the interpretation of the CDS-2 scores the aim of this study was to achieve normative data of a representative sample of the German population and to evaluate the associations with depression, anxiety and sociodemographic characteristics.A nationally representative face-to-face household survey was conducted during the mid of 2009 in Germany. The sample comprised N = 2512 participants. The survey questionnaire consisted of the CDS-2, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and demographic characteristics.Case level of DP was found for 3.4% of the participants without significant sex and age differences. Although DP was strongly associated with depression and anxiety, principal component analysis clearly supported the distinctiveness of the psychopathological syndromes of depression, anxiety and DP.A criterion standard diagnostic interview for DP, anxiety and depression was not included.The results provide a framework for the interpretation of the CDS-2 scores and support the view that DP is a common and distinct psychopathological syndrome.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Adolescent, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Depression, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Anxiety, Middle Aged, Sampling Studies, Socioeconomic Factors, Depersonalization, Germany, Humans, Mass Screening, Female, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Adolescent, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Depression, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Anxiety, Middle Aged, Sampling Studies, Socioeconomic Factors, Depersonalization, Germany, Humans, Mass Screening, Female, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
