
After whole-genome duplication (WGD), deletions return most loci to single copy. However, duplicate loci may survive through selection for increased dosage. Here, we show how the WGD increased copy number of some glycolytic genes could have conferred an almost immediate selective advantage to an ancestor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, providing a rationale for the success of the WGD. We propose that the loss of other redundant genes throughout the genome resulted in incremental dosage increases for the surviving duplicated glycolytic genes. This increase gave post-WGD yeasts a growth advantage through rapid glucose fermentation; one of this lineage's many adaptations to glucose-rich environments. Our hypothesis is supported by data from enzyme kinetics and comparative genomics. Because changes in gene dosage follow directly from post-WGD deletions, dosage selection can confer an almost instantaneous benefit after WGD, unlike neofunctionalization or subfunctionalization, which require specific mutations. We also show theoretically that increased fermentative capacity is of greatest advantage when glucose resources are both large and dense, an observation potentially related to the appearance of angiosperms around the time of WGD.
570, Medicine (General), Monosaccharide Transport Proteins, QH301-705.5, Genes, Fungal, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Models, Biological, Article, R5-920, Genes, Duplicate, Gene Duplication, evolution, genome duplication, Genetics, Biology (General), Selection, Genetic, Ecology, Respiration, Cell Compartmentation, Fermentation, Genome, Fungal, Corrigendum, metabolism, Glycolysis
570, Medicine (General), Monosaccharide Transport Proteins, QH301-705.5, Genes, Fungal, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Models, Biological, Article, R5-920, Genes, Duplicate, Gene Duplication, evolution, genome duplication, Genetics, Biology (General), Selection, Genetic, Ecology, Respiration, Cell Compartmentation, Fermentation, Genome, Fungal, Corrigendum, metabolism, Glycolysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 195 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
