
doi: 10.1049/enc2.12028
Abstract Standalone multi‐energy hub is the next frontier of electric grid modernization. It is vital to optimize the standalone multi‐energy hub capacity configuration to enhance the hub reliability, economic efficiency, and sustainability. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel multi‐objective capacity configuration model for standalone multi‐energy hub considering electricity, heat and hydrogen energy uncertainty. First, the standalone multi‐energy hub model with electricity, heat, and hydrogen energy is established. It takes into account photovoltaic generators, wind generation, combined heat and power units, power to gas, gas boiler and hydrogen storage tank to meet the electrical, thermal and hydrogen energy demands. At the same time, in order to solve the influence of uncertainty on hub capacity configuration, the typical source‐load scenarios are established considering the uncertainty of wind speed, solar radiation and energy demands. On this basis, the objective functions and constraints of the capacity configuration model are presented. The improved hybrid multi‐objective particle swarm optimization algorithm and fuzzy membership function are used to solve the model. Finally, case studies verified the effectiveness and rationality of the proposed model.
TK1001-1841, Production of electric energy or power. Powerplants. Central stations, Hydrogen storage and technology, Optimisation techniques, Solar power stations and photovoltaic power systems, Other power stations and plants, HD9502-9502.5, Power system management, operation and economics, Energy industries. Energy policy. Fuel trade
TK1001-1841, Production of electric energy or power. Powerplants. Central stations, Hydrogen storage and technology, Optimisation techniques, Solar power stations and photovoltaic power systems, Other power stations and plants, HD9502-9502.5, Power system management, operation and economics, Energy industries. Energy policy. Fuel trade
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
