
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Population size is a key metric for management and policy decisions, yet wildlife monitoring programs are often limited by the spatial and temporal scope of surveys. In these cases, citizen science data may provide complementary information at higher resolution and greater extent. We present a case study demonstrating how data from the eBird citizen science program can be combined with regional monitoring efforts by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to produce high-resolution estimates of golden eagle abundance. We developed a model that uses aerial survey data from the western United States to calibrate high-resolution annual estimates of relative abundance from eBird. Using this model, we compared regional population size estimates based on the calibrated eBird information to those based on aerial survey data alone. Population size estimates based on the calibrated eBird information had strong correspondence to estimates from aerial survey data in two out of four regions, and population trajectories based on the two approaches showed high correlations. We demonstrate how the combination of citizen science data and targeted surveys can be used to (a) increase the spatial resolution of population size estimates, (b) extend the spatial extent of inference, and (c) predict population size beyond the temporal period of surveys. Findings based on this case study can be used to refine policy metrics used by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and inform permitting regulations (e.g., mortality/harm associated with wind energy development). Policy implications. Our results demonstrate the ability of citizen science data to complement targeted monitoring programs and improve the efficacy of decision frameworks that require information on population size or trajectory. After validating citizen science data against survey-based benchmarks, agencies can harness strengths of citizen science data to supplement information needs and increase the resolution and extent of population size predictions.
Funding provided by: Leon Levy FoundationCrossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007027Award Number: Funding provided by: Wolf Creek Charitable FoundationCrossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100017739Award Number: Funding provided by: National Science FoundationCrossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001Award Number: Funding provided by: U.S. Geological SurveyCrossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000203Award Number:
abundance, Population size, Wildlife monitoring, wind energy, eBird, Citizen science, species distribution models, golden eagle
abundance, Population size, Wildlife monitoring, wind energy, eBird, Citizen science, species distribution models, golden eagle
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
views | 1 |