Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A Comparison between OPARI2 and the OpenMP Tools Interface in the Context of Score-P

Authors: Daniel Lorenz 0001; Robert Dietrich; Ronny Tschüter; Felix Wolf 0001;

A Comparison between OPARI2 and the OpenMP Tools Interface in the Context of Score-P

Abstract

The upcoming OpenMP tools interface (OMPT) has been designed as a portable interface for performance analysis tools. It provides access to OpenMP-related information at program runtime and can thus extend the analysis capabilities of current performance tools. This paper compares the functionality and convenience of OMPT with OPARI2 for event-based performance analysis. For this purpose, we integrated OMPT into the measurement infrastructure Score-P, which previously accessed OpenMP-related information using only source-level instrumentation with OPARI2. For comparison, we performed Score-P measurements of the NAS Parallel Benchmark suite and the LULESH code with OPARI2 instrumentation and with OMPT. In each case, we determined the overhead and evaluated the output. We found that the measurement overhead is dominated by the measurement system, while the contribution of the event source remains negligible. Moreover, OMPT and OPARI2 provide complementary views of the performance behavior. Whereas OPARI2 maintains a strictly source-code-centric perspective that reflects OpenMP standard abstractions, OMPT mirrors the behavior of the OpenMP runtime and exposes compiler optimizations.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!