Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Plant Pathologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Plant Pathology
Article . 1993 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Resistance to Erysiphe fischeri in two populations of Senecio vulgaris

Authors: J. R. BEVAN; D. D. CLARKE; I. R. CRUTE;

Resistance to Erysiphe fischeri in two populations of Senecio vulgaris

Abstract

The frequency and distribution of different specific phenotypes for resistance to Erysiphe fischeri was studied in two populations of the annual weed Senecio vulgaris (groundsel) one located in Glasgow, Scotland the other located about 480 km south at Wellesbourne, England. Progeny of individual plants from the two host populations were tested for their response to up to 10 different isolates of E. fischeri , five from each location; each isolate had a different specific virulence phenotype. Most plants in each sample were susceptible to all 10 isolates. The proportion of plants whose progeny were resistant to a particular isolate ranged from 1% to 10% with the exception of resistance to one isolate that occurred with a frequency of 37% at Wellesbourne. Overall, resistance to one or more of the 10 isolates appeared to be more common in the plant population sampled at Wellesbourne than at Glasgow. Of the total number of groundsel line/isolate combinations tested, 10% involving Wellesbourne plants and 2% involving Glasgow plants were incompatible, i.e. resistant/avirulent. Both groundsel populations tended to be dominated by one or two resistance phenotypes but they were nevertheless highly heterogeneous when less frequent resistance phenotypes were considered. This was particularly evident at Wellesbourne where 10 different resistance phenotypes were recorded amongst a total of 75 plants growing within an area of 1 m 2 .

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    234
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
234
Top 1%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!