
pmid: 23371454
Ependymomas comprise 8 % of all intracranial tumors in children <15 years. Recent studies revealed that some supratentorial ependymomas express neuronal antigens and that high expression of neurofilament protein light polypeptide (NEFL) correlates with better clinical outcome. We retrospectively analyzed an expanded panel of proteins in 6 supratentorial, 15 posterior fossa and 4 spinal pediatric ependymomas by immunohistochemistry. Expression of high and low affinity neurotrophin receptors TrkA (NTRK1) and p75 (NGFR), pan-neuronal markers NeuN (RBFOX3) and synaptophysin, radial glial marker SOX9, adhesion molecules CD56 (NCAM) and CD44, junctional protein connexin 43 (GJA1), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), epithelial membrane antigen and proliferation associated antigen Ki-67 were evaluated in a semi-quantitative or quantitative (Ki-67 and NeuN-index) fashion. We found p75 and NeuN to be expressed at significantly higher levels in supratentorial versus infratentorial tumors and GFAP to be expressed at significantly higher levels in infratentorial lesions. In conclusion, immunohistochemical expression of p75, NeuN and GFAP differed in ependymomas depending on tumor topography supporting the view of divergent cells of origin. However, because of the small sample size the results are of preliminary nature and replication in a larger cohort would be desirable.
Male, Adolescent, Infant, Supratentorial Neoplasms, Antigens, Nuclear, Infratentorial Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Receptors, Nerve Growth Factor, Prognosis, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Ependymoma, Child, Preschool, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Grading, Child, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
Male, Adolescent, Infant, Supratentorial Neoplasms, Antigens, Nuclear, Infratentorial Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Receptors, Nerve Growth Factor, Prognosis, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Ependymoma, Child, Preschool, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Grading, Child, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
