
AbstractA long-standing conjecture states that the crossing number of the Cartesian product of cycles Cm×Cn is (m−2)n, for every m, n satisfying n⩾m⩾3. A crossing is proper if it occurs between edges in different principal cycles. In this paper drawings of Cm×Cn with the principal n-cycles pairwise disjoint or the principal m-cycles pairwise disjoint are analyzed, and it is proved that every such drawing has at least (m−2)n proper crossings. As an application of this result, we prove that the crossing number of Cm×Cn is at least (m−2)n/2, for all integers m, n such that n⩾m⩾4. This is the best general lower bound known for the crossing number of Cm×Cn.
Computational Theory and Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Theoretical Computer Science
Computational Theory and Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Theoretical Computer Science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
