Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.51855
This discussion paper contains a comparative analysis of the Open Access policies adopted by Italian universities. The comparison has two goals: to verify the level of alignment of the policies, and compare them with the good practices from the Horizon2020 guidelines and the recommendations of S. Shieber e P. Suber. The analysis has been conducted with an empirical methodology that involved all the reference persons of the 14 Italian universities that adopted an OA policy, and using as support the registry of OA policies ROARMAP. The results highlights that misalignments regard deposit modalities (time, article version, waiver options) and the way Open Access is pursued and/or encouraged. In addition, a few recommendations have been drafted from the comparison with best practices, regarding the following points: enablers of Open Access by Default, support to the “Gold Road”, reuse licences, and open research data.
PASTEUR4OA, Open Access, Horizon 2020, Italy, Policy analysis, Policy alignment
PASTEUR4OA, Open Access, Horizon 2020, Italy, Policy analysis, Policy alignment
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 | |
| downloads | 3 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts