Views provided by UsageCounts
Advances in technology are increasing the risks of participating in educational technology research. Data can more easily be aggregated from multiple sources, from both inside and outside of the classroom, and is beginning to include physiological data. Yet, few studies in educational technology research relate to informed consent processes that evaluate approaches aimed at improving participant understanding of risks and the effects of such approaches on participant likelihood to consent. This data set includes raw data from a study on informed consent involving 127 first year undergraduate students that consented to participate in educational technology research. Best practices to informed consent were adopted for the study such as making use of an enhanced consent form and a comprehension quiz. Results of the study suggest that attempts to facilitate participant understanding of data sharing risks via guiding questions in a prior knowledge questionnaire resulted in lower consent form comprehension quiz scores, yet higher rates of consent. The data set is composed by: ‘Classes’ spreadsheet: including the relation of flows, group of students, number of students, instructor id, day and time ‘Participants’ spreadsheet: including the relation of ID (of each participant), if s/he consented, group class, flow and language ‘Prior knowledge Survey’ spreadsheet: participant’s ID and ID, relevant prior knowledge questionnaire data (questions included). ‘Quiz data’ spreadsheet: participant’s ID, quiz data and survey data (questions included)
Ethics, Responsible Research, Informed Consent, Educational Technology, Data Sharing Risks
Ethics, Responsible Research, Informed Consent, Educational Technology, Data Sharing Risks
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 1 |

Views provided by UsageCounts