Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
ZENODO
Dataset . 2019
Data sources: Datacite
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Does consent form comprehension affect the rate of consenting participants in educational technology research?

Authors: Beardsley, Marc; Martinez-Moreno, Judit; Santos, Patricia; Hernández-Leo, Davinia;

Does consent form comprehension affect the rate of consenting participants in educational technology research?

Abstract

Advances in technology are increasing the risks of participating in educational technology research. Data can more easily be aggregated from multiple sources, from both inside and outside of the classroom, and is beginning to include physiological data. Yet, few studies in educational technology research relate to informed consent processes that evaluate approaches aimed at improving participant understanding of risks and the effects of such approaches on participant likelihood to consent. This data set includes raw data from a study on informed consent involving 127 first year undergraduate students that consented to participate in educational technology research. Best practices to informed consent were adopted for the study such as making use of an enhanced consent form and a comprehension quiz. Results of the study suggest that attempts to facilitate participant understanding of data sharing risks via guiding questions in a prior knowledge questionnaire resulted in lower consent form comprehension quiz scores, yet higher rates of consent. The data set is composed by: ‘Classes’ spreadsheet: including the relation of flows, group of students, number of students, instructor id, day and time ‘Participants’ spreadsheet: including the relation of ID (of each participant), if s/he consented, group class, flow and language ‘Prior knowledge Survey’ spreadsheet: participant’s ID and ID, relevant prior knowledge questionnaire data (questions included). ‘Quiz data’ spreadsheet: participant’s ID, quiz data and survey data (questions included)

Keywords

Ethics, Responsible Research, Informed Consent, Educational Technology, Data Sharing Risks

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 1
  • 1
    views
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
1