Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Screening for platelet auto-antibodies by flow cytometry and their evaluation by the MAIPA technique.

Authors: M, Janisiw; B, Eichelberger; D, Koren; S, Panzer;

Screening for platelet auto-antibodies by flow cytometry and their evaluation by the MAIPA technique.

Abstract

The determination of platelet antibodies assists in the diagnosis of immune thrombocytopenia. Among the various techniques which have been used two major ways for the determination of these antibodies have entered the routine use, determination of in vivo platelet bound total IgG, termed platelet-associated IgG, PAIgG, and that of specifically to particular platelet glycoproteins bound IgG, GP-IgG. The former has been found to be non-specific, and the evaluation of the latter is rather laborious. Furthermore, both require a large number of platelets. By flowcytometry, however, PAIgG can be determined even if platelet counts are very low. We therefore evaluated in 30 patients' samples if the flowcytometric determination of PAIgG can serve to screen for platelet antibodies. Positive samples subsequently are evaluated by a glycoprotein-specific detection technique (MAIPA). We show that in patients with suspected autoimmune thrombocytopenia (AITP) and in secondary AITP PAIgG is elevated in 83%. However, only 30% of patients' samples have detectable antibodies by the MAIPA technique. Based on the findings that by the MAIPA technique antibodies were only detectable in samples which had also elevated levels of PAIgG we consider the flowcytometric determination of PAIgG useful for screening, prior to the more laborious investigation by the MAIPA assay.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Blood Platelets, Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Platelet Membrane Glycoproteins, Flow Cytometry, Diagnosis, Differential, Antibody Specificity, Predictive Value of Tests, Immunoglobulin G, Humans, Autoantibodies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!