Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

In vitro and in vivo studies on microcapsules and tabletted microcapsules of cephradine.

Authors: T, Tuncel; N, Bergsadi; L, Akin; G, Otük; I, Kuşçu;

In vitro and in vivo studies on microcapsules and tabletted microcapsules of cephradine.

Abstract

Cephradine was microencapsulated by coacervation. Ethyl cellulose was used as the polymer and a core/wall ratio of 1:1 was selected. The repose angle, apparent and tapped density, particle size distribution of cephradine microcapsules (CM) and of cephradine powder were examined. Then flat-surfaced tablets of CM were prepared using Avicel PH 101 and magnesium stearate. In vitro and in vivo properties of CM and tabletted CM (both equivalent to 150 mg cephradine) were compared with commercial capsules (equivalent to 250 mg cephradine). The dissolution studies were carried out by the rotating basket method and the agar diffusion method was applied for quantitative determinations. Among the investigated kinetic models for the release of cephradine from CM and tabletted CM the best fit was found with the Higuchi model. In vivo studies were made in rabbits. Bioavailabilities of CM and their tabletted form were higher than that of the commercial capsules. In vitro/in vivo correlations between mean residence time (MRT) and mean dissolution time (MDT) for CM and tabletted CM were calculated. A good correlation was found between the in vitro and in vivo results.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cephradine, Staphylococcus aureus, Biological Availability, Capsules, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Cephalosporins, Kinetics, Animals, Rabbits, Particle Size, Powders, Tablets

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!