Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Student evaluation of the curriculum coordination between two affiliated departments (environmental health versus preventive medicine and community health) in undergraduate medical education].

Authors: H, Kahyo; Y, Kodama;

[Student evaluation of the curriculum coordination between two affiliated departments (environmental health versus preventive medicine and community health) in undergraduate medical education].

Abstract

In order to assess the degree of curriculum coordination between the course for environmental health (3rd year, 100 hrs.) and that of preventive medicine and community health (4th year, 160 hrs.) in a medical school founded 1978, the responses for the related questions in the students evaluations (anonymous) were monitored annually from 1987-94. The former is a course that mainly deals with environmental health, occupational hygiene, nutrition and food poisoning, while the latter deals with health statistics, epidemiology, health promotion and health education, community health (including maternal and child health, school health, occupational health, gerontological health etc.) and health administration. Approximately 60% of the 786 medical students responded affirmatively as "fairly well coordinated" and less than 5% responded negatively as "not well coordinated". Analysis of the free answers columns shows that the characteristic contrasts between two courses/disciplines as each of the courses had been designed for are maintained and can be obtained from the courses. These results show the necessity of similar evaluative analyses for other courses to ensure appropriate division and coordination between affiliated courses in the undergraduate medical education program.

Keywords

Occupational Medicine, Humans, Curriculum, Preventive Medicine, Public Health, Students, Environmental Health, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Program Evaluation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!