Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Implantation of a unipolar cardioverter/defibrillator system under local anaesthesia.

Authors: G, Stix; A, Anvari; M, Grabenwöger; C, Merhaut; Z, Türel; G, Laufer; H, Schmidinger;

Implantation of a unipolar cardioverter/defibrillator system under local anaesthesia.

Abstract

To evaluate prospectively the safety and feasibility of the implantation of cardioverter/defibrillator systems under local anaesthesia. Conventionally, cardioverter/defibrillator systems are implanted under general anaesthesia. With the development of single-lead transvenous unipolar cardioverter/defibrillator systems for subpectoral implantation a pacemaker-like approach for device implantation appears applicable.Implantation of a single-lead transvenous unipolar cardioverter/defibrillator under local anaesthesia with sedation for defibrillation threshold testing was performed in 37 consecutive patients. The presenting arrhythmia was ventricular fibrillation in 13 patients, and monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in 24 patients. A 1% lidocaine solution was used for local anaesthesia, and midazolam was applied for sedation to perform defibrillation threshold testing. Arterial blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation and heart rate were monitored throughout the procedure. The patient's tolerance of the implantation procedure was evaluated with a standardized questionnaire.The unipolar transvenous cardioverter/defibrillator system was implanted successfully in all patients under local anaesthesia. During defibrillation threshold testing, sufficient sedation was achieved with 12.5 +/- 3.7 mg midazolam. For determination of the defibrillation threshold 5.9 +/- 1.4 episodes of ventricular fibrillation were induced. The mean defibrillation threshold was 13.1 +/- 5.5 J, and the mean duration of the implantation procedure was 68 +/- 30 min. Mean heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure and arterial oxygen saturation were not significantly different before and after defibrillation threshold testing. Twenty-six patients (70%) were symptom-free throughout the implantation procedure; most of the remaining patients reported minor symptoms. There were no complications, and patients were discharged 2.2 +/- 0.7 days after implantation. In 12 patients, post-implant testing of the implantable cardioverter/defibrillators was performed successfully, without sedation, 2.8 +/- 1.4 days after as an outpatient procedure.Single-lead unipolar transvenous implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be safely implanted under local anaesthesia with mild sedation for defibrillation threshold testing. The procedure is well tolerated.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Electric Countershock, Differential Threshold, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Defibrillators, Implantable, Postoperative Complications, Treatment Outcome, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Female, Radiography, Thoracic, Prospective Studies, Aged, Anesthesia, Local

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!