Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Recurrent tumor after R0 resection of colorectal liver metastases. Incidence, resectability and prognosis].

Authors: J, Scheele; R, Stangl; K, Schmidt; A, Altendorf-Hofmann;

[Recurrent tumor after R0 resection of colorectal liver metastases. Incidence, resectability and prognosis].

Abstract

In the period 1960 to 1992 a total of 366 patients underwent macroscopic and histologic complete resection (R0) of colorectal liver metastases. Excluding 16 operative deaths and 4 patients with incomplete follow-up information, 346 patients form the basis for this report. Of them, 240 (69.4%) developed recurrent disease involving the liver in 136 (39.3%) instances. 71 patients underwent a tumor related reoperation with a re-resection performed in 60 cases. This involved the liver in 22 patients. 47 of these procedures (19.6% of all recurrences), and 16 re-resections of the liver (11.8% of hepatic recurrences) were ultimately classified R0. Additional 9 patients who had the initial liver resection performed in other hospitals underwent hepatic re-resection which was classified R0 in 8. Out of 8 subsequent reoperations, 3 addressed the liver. Operative mortality in the 34 re-resections at the liver was 2.9% while nonlethal morbidity was 17.7%. After a minimum and median follow-up time of 18 and 49 months, resp., 27 patients are alive without recurrent disease, including 11 patients with hepatic re-resection. Another 4 patients are alive with disease, one of them after repeat liver resection. 5-year survival from re-resection is 39.0% for the entire group of 55 R0-patients, and 45.6% for the 24 who underwent hepatic R0-re-resection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Reoperation, Liver Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Middle Aged, Survival Rate, Hepatectomy, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Colorectal Neoplasms, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Neoplasm Staging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    25
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
25
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!