Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The effect of flavomycin on the fattening performance of bulls].

Authors: H J, Alert; S, Poppe; M, Lohner;

[The effect of flavomycin on the fattening performance of bulls].

Abstract

An experiment with 36 fattening friesian bulls was conducted to investigate the effect of flavomycin (50 mg/d.animal). The additional flavomycin significantly enhanced the apparent digestibility of the organic matter, crude fibre and NFE. The animals in the experimental group consumed significantly more feed than the controls until the 56th day of the experiment. No appreciable differences between the two groups occurred thereafter. The daily gain of the animals in the experimental group was always higher than that of the controls except from day 140 to day 168 of the experiment. The mean daily gain for the animals in the control group was 949 g, whereas for those in the control group it was 916 g. This difference is statistically significant. The daily gains of the experimental animals were 3.5% higher than those of the controls. The animals receiving flavomycin tended to need a lower energy input than the controls. The control animals had a mean requirement of 3.80 kEFr/kg gain compared with 3.68 kEFr/kg for the experimental animals. This corresponds to a 3.2% improvement in energy conversion. As far as slaughter performance was concerned, the additional flavomycin had no effect on carcase composition, organ weight and chemical composition. Only the internal fat fraction was increased somewhat by flavomycin. The flavomycin had no influence on the fatty acid composition in the rumen. In particular, the ratio of acetic acid to propionic acid was unchanged. A trend to a slight increase in the total fatty acid concentration was observed. The treatment did not affect the number of protozoa in the rumen.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Meat, Rumen, Muscles, Eukaryota, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Weight Gain, Animal Feed, Eating, Bambermycins, Adipose Tissue, Ammonia, Animals, Cattle, Digestion, Energy Intake

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!