Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Bilateral breast cancer.

Authors: J, Gogas; C, Markopoulos; P, Skandalakis; H, Gogas;

Bilateral breast cancer.

Abstract

Seventy-eight confirmed cases of second primary breast cancer in the contralateral breast were encountered over a 22-year period in 1332 women with invasive breast cancer treated in our department. Tumors were grouped into those simultaneously detected in both breasts or within 6 months of each other (synchronous, 1.6%) and those detected within more than 6 months (metachronous, 4.2%). The mean interval between metachronous cancers was 117 months. Patients with bilateral tumors were more likely to have a family history of breast cancer than those with unilateral disease. Women with metachronous tumors tended to be younger when diagnosed with the first carcinoma as compared with those having unilateral or synchronous bilateral cancers. No differences were noticed in size and lymph node status between the first or second tumor of bilateral cases in comparison to patients with unilateral disease. Significantly more (P < 0.05) first metachronous tumors were found to be lobular invasive cancers. Histopathologic type of the first tumor was the same as the second in 62.8 per cent of all cases. Concordance of estrogen receptor status between bilateral tumors was 71.4 per cent. Our results indicate that the risk of developing, a contralateral breast cancer is related to the patient's age, family history of breast cancer, and lobular histology of the tumor.

Keywords

Adult, Menarche, Time Factors, Incidence, Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast, Age Factors, Breast Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Second Primary, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Multiple Primary, Carcinoma, Lobular, Parity, Receptors, Estrogen, Risk Factors, Lymphatic Metastasis, Humans, Female, Menopause, Aged, Neoplasm Staging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    66
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
66
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!