
Evaluative classifications and rating scales as presently applied to health education were reviewed and summarized. In addition, evaluative activities and research directions in health education conducted as part of health care services for the aged were reviewed, and future challenges surveyed. 1. Evaluative classifications were divided according to the time of application between: A) evaluation of performance and B) evaluation of results. 2. Evaluative scales for Category A) were classified as: (1)quantitative volume of performance; (2)process; (3)fundamental supportive systems. Those for Category B) were classified as: (1)changes in knowledge, attitude, behavior; (2)objective state of health; (3)financial aspects; (4)subjective state of health, QOL; (5)social support. 3. On the basis of the previous studies, evaluative activities and research directions were examined in light of: evaluation of performance; evaluation of results; correspondence of performance to results; accuracy of evaluative scales; evaluative activities in practice. 4. In view of the foregoing findings, it appears that more efforts should be directed in the future to the study of "process" and "fundamental supportive systems" for Category A) and "subjective health, QOL" and "social support" for Category B). In addition, it is necessary to develop evaluative scales for assessing subjective changes and changes in knowledge, attitude, and behavior. Assessment of the validity of various scales is also required.
Evaluation Studies as Topic, Health Services for the Aged, Humans, Health Education, Aged
Evaluation Studies as Topic, Health Services for the Aged, Humans, Health Education, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
