Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Readability of patient education materials.

Authors: A S, Vivian; E J, Robertson;

Readability of patient education materials.

Abstract

The reading level of representative samples of patient education materials obtained from public foundations, pharmaceutical manufacturers, hospitals, and commercial sources was determined according to three readability tests: Fry Readability Graph, Gunning Fog Index, and McLaughlin SMOG Grading Formula. The average reading levels ranged from grade 8.0 for foundation-sponsored materials to grade 9.9 for materials developed by pharmaceutical manufacturers. These levels are higher than the estimated average reading level of the American public. The calculation of correlation coefficients between each of the three methods, using a linear regression equation, indicates that the readability formulas do not correlate well with one another. Although these formulas may provide a convenient method to estimate the reading level, any one formula may not be appropriate for the evaluation of all health-related materials. Educational materials should be tested for readability and comprehension in sample populations before being accepted for general use.

Keywords

Patient Education as Topic, Reading, Teaching Materials, Humans, Pamphlets

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    37
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
37
Top 10%
Top 1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!