
A cued sentence-recall task was used to determine the extent to which 24 mildly mentally retarded adolescents and 24 equal-MA nonretarded children differed in their ability to recall sentences and to infer and utilize particular exemplars of general nouns as retrieval cues. We found that the sentence recall performance of the retarded adolescents was poor relative to that of the nonretarded children; however, both groups found general and particular cues to be equally effective retrieval aids for target sentences. Differential sentence reconstruction and editing strategies were suggested as possible sources of the obtained recall differences.
Male, Memory, Intellectual Disability, Mental Recall, Humans, Female, Cues, Language
Male, Memory, Intellectual Disability, Mental Recall, Humans, Female, Cues, Language
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
