Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Archives of Patholog...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Standardized Reporting of Core Needle Biopsy Tortuosity.

Authors: Jacobs, Jackson; Wiener, Dan; Pathak, Tilak; Farré, Xavier; Mirtti, Tuomas; Janowczyk, Andrew;

Standardized Reporting of Core Needle Biopsy Tortuosity.

Abstract

Core needle biopsies (CNBs) are among the most common biopsy procedures, yielding long, thin deformation-prone cores. Core deformation results in both distorted histologic features and tortuosity (ie, deviation from the ideal straight path) along the length of the core. Tortuosity creates challenges in slide preparation and downstream pathologist assessment (eg, absent diagnostically relevant tissue after sectioning), indicating a clinical need for its minimization. Despite this need, there is no standard protocol for reporting CNB tortuosity.To (1) establish an actionable protocol for scoring CNB tortuosity, (2) build BiopTort, a software tool assigning CNB images interpretable, tiered scores consistent with the protocol, and (3) investigate our protocol and BiopTort's impact on interpathologist concordance and scoring time.Using a held-out CNB data set (N = 167), 3 pathologists assessed tortuosity in 3 sequential stages: (1) Baseline: a 3-tier scale based on prior experience, (2) Protocol: rescored with our 4-tier Tortuosity Scoring Protocol, (3) BiopTort-Aided: rescored with the protocol alongside BiopTort. Interrater concordance for each stage, using the Fleiss κ, was recorded.Fleiss κ was 0.19, 0.40, and 0.63, and average time per slide was 8.0, 24.2, and 13.3 seconds for stages 1 to 3, respectively. BiopTort was statistically noninferior to human interrater pairwise concordance.These results suggest our protocol lessens interpathologist variability, with BiopTort further reducing variability and scoring protocol employment time cost. When deployed in CNB quality control workflows, our computer-aided protocol appears well situated to facilitate standardized, efficient, and actionable reporting of CNB tortuosity. BiopTort is open-source (http://bioptort.com).

Country
Switzerland
Keywords

616

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
gold
Related to Research communities