Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Comparison of foetal and neonatal mortality of monochorionic monoamniotic and monochorionic biamniotic twin pregnancies].

Authors: A-C, Périnet; M, Massoud; L, Picard; A, Fichez; C, Huissoud; B, Nadaud; E, Rault;

[Comparison of foetal and neonatal mortality of monochorionic monoamniotic and monochorionic biamniotic twin pregnancies].

Abstract

To compare the mortality of monochorionic-monoamniotic (MCMA) and monochorionic-biamniotic (MCBA) twin pregnancies, from 14weeks of gestation to 28th day of life, before and after exclusion of major congenital malformations.We conducted a retrospective cohort study in two level 3 maternity units of the Hospices civils de Lyon (France) including all patients with a monochorionic twin pregnancy between January 2013 and December 2020. We excluded TRAP sequences and conjoined twins.A total of 38 MCMA and 658 MCBA pregnancies were included. We showed an increase in overall mortality in the MCMA group compared to the MCBA group (31.6% versus 16.4%, P=0.03) even after exclusion of major congenital malformations (20.3% versus 9.5%, P=0.01). The main cause of mortality found in the MCMA group was the occurrence of unexpected IUGR.MCMA pregnancies have a higher foetal and neonatal mortality rate than MCBA pregnancies even after exclusion of congenital malformations related to the occurrence of unexpected MFIU.

Keywords

Pregnancy, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Twin, Humans, Female, Prenatal Care, Twins, Monozygotic, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!