
pmid: 36027895
pmc: PMC9942799
Age estimation is an inescapable part of every identification process. During growth and development, it is possible to estimate age based on the developmental stages of teeth. The aim of this study was to evaluate three frequently used methods for dental age estimation on a broad sample of Croatian children. The sample comprised 1996 digital, standardized orthopantomograms of children (1121 boys and 875 girls) aged 5 to 16, collected in four major Croatian cities. Age was estimated according to the Demirjian, Willems and Haavikko methods and the accuracy of the estimation was evaluated. The Kappa for intra-examiner agreement was 0.83 for the Haavikko stages and 0.92 for the Demirjian stages. Using the Demirjian method, the average overestimation of age was 0.80 years for boys and 0.84 years for girls. The Willems method overestimated the mean age by 0.41 years in boys and 0.22 years in girls. The Haavikko method underestimated the mean age by 0.60 years in boys and 0.80 years in girls. The Willems method proved to be the most accurate and can be used for dental age estimation among Croatian children. The Demirjian and Haavikko methods showed greater deviation between dental and chronological age and require adaptation when used in the Croatian population.
dental age estimation ; forensic odontology ; Willems method ; Demirjian method ; Haavikko method ; children, Male, Haavikko method, Croatia, Infant, forensic odontology, children, Demirjian method, Radiography, Panoramic, Humans, Female, Age Determination by Teeth, dental age estimation, Willems method, Child, Head, Tooth
dental age estimation ; forensic odontology ; Willems method ; Demirjian method ; Haavikko method ; children, Male, Haavikko method, Croatia, Infant, forensic odontology, children, Demirjian method, Radiography, Panoramic, Humans, Female, Age Determination by Teeth, dental age estimation, Willems method, Child, Head, Tooth
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
