
Betula pendula and B. pubescens are widespread species inhabiting the forest zone of Russia. At the same time, they are closely related species making up transitional forms. It is believed that their ecological ranges are overlapping to a great extent, although B. pubescens is more hydrophilic than B. pendula and less exigent to sunlight. These data, obtained by means of empirical observations, help to understand the ecology of both birch species but so far are not statistically proved. An analysis of habitat distribution of the two birch species is carried out, and a comparison is performed of their ecological relations with such factors as humidification, trophic status, acidity, illumination, and nitrogen soil richness (graded by D. Tzyganov scales). It is shown that B. pendula and B. pubescens differ significantly with relation to humidification, soil richness, nitrogen concentration, and illumination, while do not differ with relation to acidity. Habitat preferences indicate that B. pubescens is more eurytopic species than B. pendula. Although synecolog-ical ranges of both species overlap, their synecological optima still clearly stand apart.
Soil, Forests, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Betula, Russia
Soil, Forests, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Betula, Russia
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
