
The term "LDL-Hypothesis" is frequently used to describe the association between LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and cardiovascular outcomes. In the light of recent results of randomized trials the question arises whether the term hypothesis is still adequate. Considering the causal importance of LDL for the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, epidemiological evidence and the clear genetic association of LDL-C with cardiovascular risk as well as the large statin trials and the reduction of events by a non-statin intervention in the IMPROVE-IT study, the term "hypothesis" appears to be outdated and should be replaced by "LDL-causality".
Evidence-Based Medicine, Reproducibility of Results, Hyperlipidemias, Cholesterol, LDL, Comorbidity, Atherosclerosis, Risk Assessment, Sensitivity and Specificity, Causality, Prevalence, Humans, Biomarkers
Evidence-Based Medicine, Reproducibility of Results, Hyperlipidemias, Cholesterol, LDL, Comorbidity, Atherosclerosis, Risk Assessment, Sensitivity and Specificity, Causality, Prevalence, Humans, Biomarkers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
