
pmid: 24352962
handle: 20.500.12327/3530
The present work aimed to identify the nutritional characteristics that best explain cereal feed preference in pigs. A total of 25 cereals of known preference (at 60% of inclusion in complete feed) from a previous study were evaluated. The cereals were analyzed for DM, OM, crude fiber, ether extract, CP, GE, digestible starch, and glycemic index. Additionally, for 12 of the cereals, complete feeds (the same composition as those previously used to measure preference) were prepared, analyzed for DM, OM, CP, and starch, and fed to pigs (33 ± 5.1 kg BW) fitted with ileal T-cannulae to assess the apparent ileal (AID) and total tract digestibility (ATTD) of these nutrients using titanium dioxide as an indigestible marker. The relationships among the different energy and nutrient contents were studied by principal component (PC) analysis, and the correlations between the generated PC scores and cereal preference were analyzed. A correlation between preference and the second PC obtained with data of the 25 cereals was observed (P < 0.01), which indicated that crude fiber (negatively) and digestible starch, OM, and glycemic index (positively) were correlated with feed preference. Statistically significant linear relationships with preference were confirmed for crude fiber, digestible starch, and glycemic index (R2 = 0.38, 0.36, and 0.23, respectively; P < 0.02). Similarly, the first PC obtained with data of the 12 feeds also correlated with preference (P < 0.01), indicating that the digestible nutrients (positively) and the nondigestible nutrients (negatively) were correlated with preference. Statistically significant relationships with preference were observed for the contents of starch (total, digestible AID, and digestible ATTD: R2 = 0.62, 0.66, and 0.63, respectively; P < 0.01), AID DM (digestible and nondigestible: R2 = 0.41 and 0.44, respectively; P < 0.05), ATTD DM (digestible and nondigestible: R2 = 0.67 and 0.70, respectively; P < 0.01), AID OM (digestible and nondigestible: R2 = 0.45 and 0.43, respectively; P < 0.05), and ATTD OM (digestible and nondigestible: R2 = 0.64 and 0.66, respectively; P < 0.01). It is concluded that cereal preference in pigs is positively related with their content in digestible nutrients, such as starch, and negatively related with their nondigestible nutrients, such as crude fiber.
This study was supported by CICYT (Project AGL2005-07438-C02-02/GAN; Ministry of Science and Education, Madrid, Spain) and CDTI (Project 050369; Spanish Innovation Agency, Ministry of Industry Tourism and Trade, Madrid, Spain). The authors acknowledge the support received from S. Pujol and T. van Kempen for the glycemic index determination and IRTA’s laboratory and farm staff.
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
Sus scrofa, 001, Animal Feed, Preference, Gastrointestinal Tract, 1311 Genetics, 636, Digestibility, Nutrient availability, Animals, Cereal, Pigs, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Digestion, 1103 Animal Science and Zoology, Edible Grain, 1106 Food Science
Sus scrofa, 001, Animal Feed, Preference, Gastrointestinal Tract, 1311 Genetics, 636, Digestibility, Nutrient availability, Animals, Cereal, Pigs, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Digestion, 1103 Animal Science and Zoology, Edible Grain, 1106 Food Science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
