
handle: 2434/1024396
In [ 1 ], we introduced a novel definition for the epistemic opacity of AI systems. Building on this, we proposed a framework for reasoning about an agent’s epistemic attitudes toward a possibly opaque algorithm, investigating the necessary conditions for achieving epistemic transparency. Unfortunately, this logical framework faced several limitations, primarily due to its overly idealized nature and the absence of a formal representation of the inner structure of AI systems. In the present work, we address these limitations by providing a more in-depth analysis of classifiers using first-order evidence logic. This step significantly enhances the applicability of our definitions of epistemic opacity and transparency to machine learning systems.
Transparent AI; epistemic opacity; epistemic logic; evidence models; neighborhood semantics
Transparent AI; epistemic opacity; epistemic logic; evidence models; neighborhood semantics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
