
The choice of income-related health inequality measures in comparative studies is often determined by custom and analytical concerns, without much explicit consideration of the vertical equity judgements underlying alternative measures. This note employs an inequality map to illustrate how these judgements determine the ranking of populations by health inequality. In particular, it is shown that relative indices of inequality in health attainments and shortfalls embody distinct vertical equity judgments, where each may represent ethically defensible positions in specific contexts. Further research is needed to explore people's preferences over distributions of income and health.
health inequality; vertical equity judgements; inequality equivalence criteria; inequality maps, Models, Statistical, 330, Health Status Disparities, Social Class, Income, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Models, Econometric, jel: jel:D63, jel: jel:I14, jel: jel:D39
health inequality; vertical equity judgements; inequality equivalence criteria; inequality maps, Models, Statistical, 330, Health Status Disparities, Social Class, Income, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Models, Econometric, jel: jel:D63, jel: jel:I14, jel: jel:D39
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
