
handle: 2268/312353
In jazz literature, «Down Beat» polls established themselves as an authoritative mean to measure any musician’s popularity. If this data is certainly relevant to music historiography, il seems doubtful to use it without any critical approach. This paper intends to interrogate the value of these famous surveys in an empiric way, following the trajectory of a single musician: Toots Thielemans (1922-2016). His career allows to look at over half a century of the polls, but also to address issues related to the ‘miscellaneous instruments’ category, in which this great exponent of the chromatic harmonica used to compete. I will discuss the organizational modality of the polls, as well as the limits imposed on the contemporary scholar by the data available.
Art & art history, Arts & humanities, Art & histoire de l’art, Arts & sciences humaines
Art & art history, Arts & humanities, Art & histoire de l’art, Arts & sciences humaines
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
