Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Open Repository and ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Pure VTT Finland
Conference object . 2011
Data sources: Pure VTT Finland
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Key performance indicators for the indoor environment

Authors: Loomans, M.G.L.C.; Huovila, Aapo; Lefebvre, Pierre-Henri; Porkka, Janne; Huovila, Pekka; Desmyter, Jan; Vaturi, Asher;

Key performance indicators for the indoor environment

Abstract

The overall quality of the indoor environment in which people live, work and spend their time and artefacts remain, is the result from a complex integration of a large number of physical attributes. These attributes result from an integration of a large number of building components. Assessing the individual components and assessing attributes individually is important, but does not guarantee unambiguously a healthy, comfortable and safe indoor environment. Prescriptive solutions may support in arriving at the desired result, however, for innovation the performance based approach should be the point of departure and this starts with performance indicators to assess this performance. Within the ongoing EU FP7 Coordination Action PERFECTION a set of performance indicators has been developed to assess the overall quality of the indoor environment in buildings. The main focus is on issues such as comfort, health and safety, but also accessibility, positive stimulation of people and, more generally, sustainability have been covered. This paper describes the constraints that relate to the development of such a framework and the changes proposed resulting from the expert assessment. An example of an indicator description and evaluation procedure is provided. From a long list of indicators identified a first proposal for a list of so-called Key Indoor Performance Indicators (KIPI's) and their evaluation procedure has been derived. This list has been assessed by different experts in different settings through various data collection methods, such as interviews, workshops,and survey. The development work has been carried out through iterations. The long-term aim of the project is to help enabling the application of new building design and technologies that improve the impact of the indoor built environment on the human well-being. The presented KIPI-list is an important starting point for that.

Countries
Netherlands, Finland, Belgium
Keywords

safety, perfection, positive stimulation, health, indoor environment, performance indicators, Engineering, computing & technology, Ingénierie, informatique & technologie, accessibility, Architecture, comfort, functionality

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green