
handle: 2263/66483
In this article, I explore the concept of Ubuntu in a context of caregiving with the aim of deconstructing the gendering of caregiving in a context of pastoral care. Using a qualitative approach, this article draws from the empirical findings of primeval praxis of Ubuntu from a study conducted on the KwaZulu-Natal chapter of South Africa’s National Research Foundation (NRF) funded ‘Archaeology of Ubuntu’ project. Empirical findings were evaluated through African women theology. Findings of this article highlight that Ubuntu in a context of caregiving is not exclusively feminine because men also display strong tendencies of care in African traditional communities. This suggests that pastoral care in an African context should not be gendered because findings of the article confirm that the Zulu elders from KwaZulu-Natal generally linked Ubuntu to communal care where men and women partnered in extending caregiving to those in need. Intradisciplinary and/or interdisciplinary implications: Although the article is written from a socio-anthropological perspective, it integrates African traditional presumptions of gender and care ethics that are significant in extending pastoral care by reviewing literature from sociology, anthropology, gender, feminist studies, practical theology and systematic theology.
SDG-05: Gender equality, Pastoral care, Archaeology of Ubuntu, justice and strong institutions, Care Ethics, Gender, SDG-10: Reduced inequalities, Practical Theology, Ubuntu, SDG-16: Peace, BV1-5099, Theology articles SDG-10, Caregiving, Web of Life, Theology articles SDG-05, Theology articles SDG-16, African women
SDG-05: Gender equality, Pastoral care, Archaeology of Ubuntu, justice and strong institutions, Care Ethics, Gender, SDG-10: Reduced inequalities, Practical Theology, Ubuntu, SDG-16: Peace, BV1-5099, Theology articles SDG-10, Caregiving, Web of Life, Theology articles SDG-05, Theology articles SDG-16, African women
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
